Search found 397 matches
- Mon Dec 23, 2013 11:56 am
- Forum: General Issues
- Topic: Extract mesh conditions
- Replies: 2
- Views: 7648
Re: Extract mesh conditions
This is a good question. You are right Apart from making sure that mesh in the upgraded state (this will not be required after update 3756, ) http://www.dynoinsight.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=2887, the only condition is that the volume has to have at least one vertex inside. What is missing in t...
- Mon Dec 23, 2013 4:17 am
- Forum: Bug Reports
- Topic: Extract bug
- Replies: 2
- Views: 8250
Re: Extract bug
Yes, this was the problem. Calling IMeshEx.Upgrade() before Extract() works. We have added a check for that. In the next update it will be automatic
Thanks for reporting
Nick
Thanks for reporting
Nick
- Mon Dec 23, 2013 3:49 am
- Forum: Bug Reports
- Topic: Extract bug
- Replies: 2
- Views: 8250
Re: Extract bug
No, it is not good. It has to work for any mesh. Try calling IMeshEx.Upgrade() before extract. we are investigating...
Nick
Nick
- Wed Dec 18, 2013 10:42 am
- Forum: General Issues
- Topic: Reducing meshed objects
- Replies: 1
- Views: 6618
Re: Reducing meshed objects
In 4.3.3751 update we have added two new methods to IMeshEx : Extract() and Merge(). The Extract() is ideal for reducing mesh
Nick
Nick
- Wed Dec 18, 2013 4:37 am
- Forum: General Issues
- Topic: Visual Diff
- Replies: 1
- Views: 6202
Re: Visual Diff
Hi Malcom To be brief, comparing surfaces like you do needs a specifically designed algorithm. Boolean Operations are too complicated and hence not robust enough for the purpose. See below. The diff on the other hand is not that complicated and can be very robust. Most likely you are trying to compa...
- Tue Dec 17, 2013 10:39 am
- Forum: Bug Reports
- Topic: iPick exception
- Replies: 5
- Views: 13913
Re: iPick exception
atrev,
We have reproduced and fixed it in the today's 3754 update
Thanks for reporting
Nick
We have reproduced and fixed it in the today's 3754 update
Thanks for reporting
Nick
- Tue Dec 17, 2013 6:26 am
- Forum: Bug Reports
- Topic: Point measurement
- Replies: 2
- Views: 7834
Re: Point measurement
Hi atrev
This is rather inconsistency. We actually did not implement transient mode for point measurements. I am not sure why. They are always persistent. I have added this to todo list for v4.4. I hope this is not urgent. The delete all operation is quick for a workaround
Regards
Nick
This is rather inconsistency. We actually did not implement transient mode for point measurements. I am not sure why. They are always persistent. I have added this to todo list for v4.4. I hope this is not urgent. The delete all operation is quick for a workaround
Regards
Nick
- Mon Dec 16, 2013 11:34 pm
- Forum: Bug Reports
- Topic: memory release
- Replies: 12
- Views: 23874
Re: memory release
Yes everything is definitely released on exiting the application, independently were there leaks or not. This is because the native process is terminated and the memory pool is removed completely for reuse by the system. It is managed by Windows
Nick
Nick
- Mon Dec 16, 2013 12:02 am
- Forum: General Issues
- Topic: Extract or isolate part of a surface
- Replies: 4
- Views: 10547
Re: Extract or isolate part of a surface
Yes with some covenants. The algorithm is optimised for performance. It finds all vertices inside the specified region and adds all adjacent simplexes. In some cases there are simplexes which intersect the region only by its edge or by internal part with all vertices outside. Such are not included. ...
- Sun Dec 15, 2013 10:36 pm
- Forum: Bug Reports
- Topic: iPick exception
- Replies: 5
- Views: 13913
Re: iPick exception
Atrev, The pick example does not have cross view. So you must be talking about your application? I do not have it. There probably is a bug, but it can be happening in a very specific situation. I could be guessing forever what your code is doing. My approximation in pick example worked OK. Could you...